This panel will discuss how the World Trade Organisation Dispute Settlement Body is adjudicating IP cases under trade law. The panellists will focus on cases involving IP with the aim of comparing the disputes at the World Trade Organisation with other international disputes on similar matters. The speakers will address the question of potential multiplication of the same or similar disputes in front of different dispute settlement mechanisms, and the issue of forum shopping that can arise.
What Safeguards for its Social Function ?
International trade and investment agreements increasingly include provisions on the protection of intellectual property. Recent decisions of arbitral tribunals shed light on this interaction between intellectual property and investment law raising important questions about the coexistence of the different bodies of law and the competence of various fora for adjudicating IP-related disputes.
This conference will critically examine the present landscape of trade and investment agreements, the legitimacy of current practices with regard to the social function of intellectual property rights and the likely avenues for future developments in the field. The latest cases will be discussed not only in the context of investor-state dispute settlement but also in the framework of the World Trade Organisation mechanisms. The interaction with fundamental rights and ethics will be explored, as well as some specific implications for the EU. The ongoing negotiations with regards to the CETA and the TTIP will serve as a common thread for the discussions.
This panel will review new challenges raised by the adjudication of IP disputes in investor-state tribunals. In particular, it will give an overview of the functioning and principles guiding investor-state arbitrations and highlight potential issues that can arise for the intellectual property regime. This panel will also address the issue of jurisdictional conflicts in the light of recent cases on IP and investment protection.
This panel will discuss how the World Trade Organisation Dispute Settlement Body is adjudicating IP cases under trade law. The panellists will focus on cases involving IP with the aim of comparing the disputes at the World Trade Organisation with other international disputes on similar matters. The speakers will address the question of potential multiplication of the same or similar disputes in front of different dispute settlement mechanisms, and the issue of forum shopping that can arise.
This panel will deal with challenges for human rights resulting in the treatment of IP as an investment. For example, trademarks have been used in the context of investment disputes with an aim to constrain public health regulation (Philip Morris). Therefore, some of the questions that will be addressed in this panel include: Have arbitral tribunals taken human rights considerations (e.g. public health, non-discrimination, due process) into account when adjudicating IP-related cases? How can the tensions between IP and human rights law be resolved in the context of investment law proceedings? Are investment tribunals well-suited to resolve IP / human rights tensions ?
This panel will focus on three closely connected issues. First, the compliance of investment protection mechanisms included in recent Free Trade Agreements, such as CETA or TTIP, with EU primary law will be scrutinized. In this sense, the panel will also address the possible implications for IP laws in Europe derived from the IP provisions of those agreements. Second, the scope of competence of the EU to enter into negotiations and be party to the agreements will be assessed: does the EU have exclusive competence or is the competence shared with the Member States? Third, the authority of the CJEU and its recent decisions regarding the free trade agreements including investment protection will be analysed.
This panel provides an overview of the current state of affairs in relation to the establishment of a permanent court in the EU to hear investment disputes. In particular, the court’s potential strengths and weaknesses will be assessed in light of the EU’s commitment to include the investment negotiations with its foreign trading partners under such a system. More generally, the panel will address the possible consequences of submitting IP disputes to such an investment court for the innovation environment in Europe.
This panel, in the form of a final roundtable, will include a discussion of controversies and policy issues arising from the utilisation of the investor-state dispute settlement in IP cases in the European context. The focus will be on the CETA and on the current negotiations of the TTIP. The panel will gather prominent personalities representing academics, practitioners and policy makers to discuss the main challenges and issues arising from these agreements.